R1 0528 vs Grok 4

R1 0528 is the better pick for most developer and tool-integrated workflows in our testing — it wins 4 of 7 benchmarks including tool_calling and agentic_planning. Grok 4 wins on strategic_analysis and offers multimodal input plus a 256k context window, but at a much higher price point ($3/$15 vs R1's $0.5/$2.15 per mTok).

deepseek

R1 0528

Overall
4.50/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
5/5
Long Context
5/5
Multilingual
5/5
Tool Calling
5/5
Classification
4/5
Agentic Planning
5/5
Structured Output
4/5
Safety Calibration
4/5
Strategic Analysis
4/5
Persona Consistency
5/5
Constrained Rewriting
4/5
Creative Problem Solving
4/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
N/A
MATH Level 5
96.6%
AIME 2025
66.4%

Pricing

Input

$0.500/MTok

Output

$2.15/MTok

Context Window164K

modelpicker.net

xai

Grok 4

Overall
4.08/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
5/5
Long Context
5/5
Multilingual
5/5
Tool Calling
4/5
Classification
4/5
Agentic Planning
3/5
Structured Output
4/5
Safety Calibration
2/5
Strategic Analysis
5/5
Persona Consistency
5/5
Constrained Rewriting
4/5
Creative Problem Solving
3/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
N/A
MATH Level 5
N/A
AIME 2025
N/A

Pricing

Input

$3.00/MTok

Output

$15.00/MTok

Context Window256K

modelpicker.net

Benchmark Analysis

Head-to-head across our measured tasks: R1 0528 wins creative_problem_solving (4 vs 3), tool_calling (5 vs 4), safety_calibration (4 vs 2), and agentic_planning (5 vs 3). Grok 4 wins strategic_analysis (5 vs 4). They tie on structured_output (4), constrained_rewriting (4), faithfulness (5), classification (4), long_context (5), persona_consistency (5), and multilingual (5). Context and rankings: R1 0528 is tied for 1st on tool_calling among 54 models (

BenchmarkR1 0528Grok 4
Faithfulness5/55/5
Long Context5/55/5
Multilingual5/55/5
Tool Calling5/54/5
Classification4/54/5
Agentic Planning5/53/5
Structured Output4/54/5
Safety Calibration4/52/5
Strategic Analysis4/55/5
Persona Consistency5/55/5
Constrained Rewriting4/54/5
Creative Problem Solving4/53/5
Summary4 wins1 wins

Pricing Analysis

Pricing difference (R1 0528 input $0.50/mTok, output $2.15/mTok; Grok 4 input $3/mTok, output $15/mTok) is large and material at scale. Assuming a 50/50 split of input/output tokens: per 1M total tokens R1 costs $1,325 (500 mTok input = $250; 500 mTok output = $1,075). Grok 4 costs $9,000 per 1M total tokens (500 mTok input = $1,500; 500 mTok output = $7,500). At 10M total tokens/month: R1 ≈ $13,250 vs Grok 4 ≈ $90,000. At 100M total tokens/month: R1 ≈ $132,500 vs Grok 4 ≈ $900,000. High-volume apps, price-sensitive startups, and applications with many short interactions should prefer R1 0528 for cost efficiency; teams that require multimodal inputs or can justify premium accuracy on strategic reasoning may accept Grok 4's higher bill.

Real-World Cost Comparison

TaskR1 0528Grok 4
iChat response$0.0012$0.0081
iBlog post$0.0046$0.032
iDocument batch$0.117$0.810
iPipeline run$1.18$8.10

How We Test

We test every model against our 12-benchmark suite covering tool calling, agentic planning, creative problem solving, safety calibration, and more. Each test is scored 1–5 by an LLM judge. Read our full methodology.