Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B

In our testing Gemma 4 31B is the better all-around choice: it wins 5 of 12 benchmarks including strategic analysis, faithfulness and structured output. Gemini 2.5 Flash is the better pick when you need extreme long-context (1,048,576 tokens) and stronger safety calibration, but it costs substantially more.

google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Overall
4.17/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
4/5
Long Context
5/5
Multilingual
5/5
Tool Calling
5/5
Classification
3/5
Agentic Planning
4/5
Structured Output
4/5
Safety Calibration
4/5
Strategic Analysis
3/5
Persona Consistency
5/5
Constrained Rewriting
4/5
Creative Problem Solving
4/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
N/A
MATH Level 5
N/A
AIME 2025
N/A

Pricing

Input

$0.300/MTok

Output

$2.50/MTok

Context Window1049K

modelpicker.net

google

Gemma 4 31B

Overall
4.42/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
5/5
Long Context
4/5
Multilingual
5/5
Tool Calling
5/5
Classification
4/5
Agentic Planning
5/5
Structured Output
5/5
Safety Calibration
2/5
Strategic Analysis
5/5
Persona Consistency
5/5
Constrained Rewriting
4/5
Creative Problem Solving
4/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
N/A
MATH Level 5
N/A
AIME 2025
N/A

Pricing

Input

$0.130/MTok

Output

$0.380/MTok

Context Window262K

modelpicker.net

Benchmark Analysis

Walkthrough of our 12-test suite (scores are from our testing). Wins: Gemma 4 31B wins five benchmarks: structured_output 5 vs 4 (Gemma tied for 1st on structured output), strategic_analysis 5 vs 3 (Gemma tied for 1st in strategic analysis), faithfulness 5 vs 4 (Gemma tied for 1st in faithfulness), classification 4 vs 3 (Gemma tied for 1st in classification), and agentic_planning 5 vs 4 (Gemma tied for 1st on agentic planning). Gemini 2.5 Flash wins two benchmarks: long_context 5 vs 4 (Gemini tied for 1st — critical for retrieval at 30K+ tokens) and safety_calibration 4 vs 2 (Gemini ranks 6 of 55 vs Gemma's rank 12). Five tests tie: constrained_rewriting (4/4), creative_problem_solving (4/4), tool_calling (5/5 — both tied for 1st), persona_consistency (5/5 — both tied for 1st), and multilingual (5/5 — both tied for 1st). What this means in practice: choose Gemma when you prioritize accurate structured outputs, nuance in multi-step reasoning and strict faithfulness to source material; choose Gemini when you need retrieval/analysis across very long documents or stronger safety refusal behavior. Rankings give context: Gemini’s long-context is tied for 1st out of 55 tested models, while Gemma ranks tied for 1st on strategic analysis and faithfulness across the same suite — these are not subjective claims but how they placed in our tests.

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashGemma 4 31B
Faithfulness4/55/5
Long Context5/54/5
Multilingual5/55/5
Tool Calling5/55/5
Classification3/54/5
Agentic Planning4/55/5
Structured Output4/55/5
Safety Calibration4/52/5
Strategic Analysis3/55/5
Persona Consistency5/55/5
Constrained Rewriting4/54/5
Creative Problem Solving4/54/5
Summary2 wins5 wins

Pricing Analysis

Payload prices: Gemini 2.5 Flash input $0.30 / mTok and output $2.50 / mTok; Gemma 4 31B input $0.13 / mTok and output $0.38 / mTok. Assuming mTok = 1,000 tokens (per-1K pricing), per 1M tokens (1,000 mTok) output-only cost is $2,500 (Gemini) vs $380 (Gemma). For a 50/50 input/output split per 1M tokens: Gemini ≈ $1,400 (0.3500 + 2.5500) vs Gemma ≈ $255 (0.13500 + 0.38500). Scale: at 10M tokens/month those become ~$14,000 vs ~$2,550; at 100M tokens/month ~$140,000 vs ~$25,500. The ~6.58× price ratio (2.5/0.38) means high-volume apps and consumer products should favor Gemma to control costs; teams that require Gemini's 1,048,576-token context window or its stronger safety calibration should budget for much higher per-token spend.

Real-World Cost Comparison

TaskGemini 2.5 FlashGemma 4 31B
iChat response$0.0013<$0.001
iBlog post$0.0052<$0.001
iDocument batch$0.131$0.022
iPipeline run$1.31$0.216

Bottom Line

Choose Gemma 4 31B if you need the best mix of strategic analysis, faithfulness, structured output and classification at a much lower price per token (input $0.13 / mTok, output $0.38 / mTok). Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash if you require extreme long-context (1,048,576-token window), stronger safety calibration, or multimodal inputs including file/audio/video handling and you can absorb roughly a 6.6× higher per-output-token cost (Gemini output $2.50 / mTok).

How We Test

We test every model against our 12-benchmark suite covering tool calling, agentic planning, creative problem solving, safety calibration, and more. Each test is scored 1–5 by an LLM judge. Read our full methodology.

Frequently Asked Questions