GPT-5 Mini vs Grok Code Fast 1

In our testing GPT-5 Mini is the better generalist: it wins 9 of 12 benchmark categories (structured output, long context, faithfulness, strategic analysis, etc.) and is stronger for schema-driven APIs and long-document tasks. Grok Code Fast 1 wins where latency/agentic coding matter (tool calling and agentic planning) and is cheaper — $1.50/output vs GPT-5 Mini's $2/output — so pick Grok for cost-sensitive, agentic coding workflows.

openai

GPT-5 Mini

Overall
4.33/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
5/5
Long Context
5/5
Multilingual
5/5
Tool Calling
3/5
Classification
4/5
Agentic Planning
4/5
Structured Output
5/5
Safety Calibration
3/5
Strategic Analysis
5/5
Persona Consistency
5/5
Constrained Rewriting
4/5
Creative Problem Solving
4/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
64.7%
MATH Level 5
97.8%
AIME 2025
86.7%

Pricing

Input

$0.250/MTok

Output

$2.00/MTok

Context Window400K

modelpicker.net

xai

Grok Code Fast 1

Overall
3.67/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
4/5
Long Context
4/5
Multilingual
4/5
Tool Calling
4/5
Classification
4/5
Agentic Planning
5/5
Structured Output
4/5
Safety Calibration
2/5
Strategic Analysis
3/5
Persona Consistency
4/5
Constrained Rewriting
3/5
Creative Problem Solving
3/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
N/A
MATH Level 5
N/A
AIME 2025
N/A

Pricing

Input

$0.200/MTok

Output

$1.50/MTok

Context Window256K

modelpicker.net

Benchmark Analysis

Summary of head-to-head results in our 12-test suite (scores shown are our 1–5 internal ratings unless noted):

  • Wins for GPT-5 Mini (9 categories): structured output 5 vs 4 (Mini tied for 1st with 24 others; meaning best-in-class JSON/schema compliance for APIs), long context 5 vs 4 (Mini tied for 1st with 36 others; better for 30K+ token retrieval), strategic analysis 5 vs 3 (Mini tied for 1st with 25 others; stronger nuanced tradeoff reasoning), faithfulness 5 vs 4 (Mini tied for 1st with 32 others; fewer hallucinations), persona consistency 5 vs 4 (tied for 1st with 36; robust character maintenance), constrained rewriting 4 vs 3 (rank 6 of 53), creative problem solving 4 vs 3 (rank 9 of 54), safety calibration 3 vs 2 (rank 10 of 55), multilingual 5 vs 4 (tied for 1st with 34 others).
  • Wins for Grok Code Fast 1 (2 categories): tool calling 4 vs 3 (Grok rank 18 of 54 vs Mini rank 47 of 54 — substantial advantage in function selection, argument accuracy and sequencing) and agentic planning 5 vs 4 (Grok tied for 1st with 14 others — better goal decomposition and recovery for agents).
  • Tie: classification 4 vs 4 (both tied for 1st with 29 others). Practical meaning: GPT-5 Mini is the superior choice when you need strict schema outputs, long-context document work, math/strategic reasoning and faithful restatement. Grok Code Fast 1 is the practical pick for agentic coding pipelines, tool-integrated workflows, and lower per-token cost. Additional external measures: beyond our internal tests, GPT-5 Mini scores 64.7% on SWE-bench Verified, 97.8% on Math Level 5, and 86.7% on AIME 2025 (on SWE-bench Verified / Math Level 5 / AIME 2025 respectively, according to Epoch AI), which support Mini’s strength on coding/math-style problems; Grok has no external Epoch AI scores in the payload.
BenchmarkGPT-5 MiniGrok Code Fast 1
Faithfulness5/54/5
Long Context5/54/5
Multilingual5/54/5
Tool Calling3/54/5
Classification4/54/5
Agentic Planning4/55/5
Structured Output5/54/5
Safety Calibration3/52/5
Strategic Analysis5/53/5
Persona Consistency5/54/5
Constrained Rewriting4/53/5
Creative Problem Solving4/53/5
Summary9 wins2 wins

Pricing Analysis

Pricing per 1,000 output tokens: GPT-5 Mini = $2.00, Grok Code Fast 1 = $1.50 (price ratio 1.333). Output-only monthly cost: 1M tokens = $2,000 (Mini) vs $1,500 (Grok) — $500 difference; 10M = $20,000 vs $15,000 — $5,000 difference; 100M = $200,000 vs $150,000 — $50,000 difference. If you include input tokens (per 1,000: Mini $0.25, Grok $0.20) and assume a 50/50 input/output split, total 1M-token cost is $1,125 (Mini) vs $850 (Grok) — $275 gap; at 100M that gap is $27,500. Who should care: startups and apps at millions of tokens/month where tens of thousands of dollars matter should prefer Grok for lower unit cost; teams that need top-tier structured output, long-context handling, or higher faithfulness may find GPT-5 Mini’s quality worth the ~33% premium on output tokens.

Real-World Cost Comparison

TaskGPT-5 MiniGrok Code Fast 1
iChat response$0.0010<$0.001
iBlog post$0.0041$0.0031
iDocument batch$0.105$0.079
iPipeline run$1.05$0.790

Bottom Line

Choose GPT-5 Mini if you need high-fidelity structured outputs (5/5 structured output), robust long-document retrieval (5/5 long context), stronger faithfulness and strategic reasoning, and you can accept ~33% higher output cost. Choose Grok Code Fast 1 if you prioritize cheaper inference and better agentic coding/tool-calling (tool calling 4 vs 3; agentic planning 5 vs 4), or if you run high-volume, tool-driven developer workflows where the per-token savings accumulate.

How We Test

We test every model against our 12-benchmark suite covering tool calling, agentic planning, creative problem solving, safety calibration, and more. Each test is scored 1–5 by an LLM judge. Read our full methodology.

Frequently Asked Questions