GPT-5 vs Grok 4

GPT-5 is the better pick for most production uses: it wins four decisive benchmarks (tool calling, structured output, creative problem solving, agentic planning) and posts strong external math and coding scores. Grok 4 ties on many dimensions (faithfulness, long context, classification) but costs more — expect a price-quality tradeoff where GPT-5 delivers higher benchmark wins at lower listed rates.

openai

GPT-5

Overall
4.50/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
5/5
Long Context
5/5
Multilingual
5/5
Tool Calling
5/5
Classification
4/5
Agentic Planning
5/5
Structured Output
5/5
Safety Calibration
2/5
Strategic Analysis
5/5
Persona Consistency
5/5
Constrained Rewriting
4/5
Creative Problem Solving
4/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
73.6%
MATH Level 5
98.1%
AIME 2025
91.4%

Pricing

Input

$1.25/MTok

Output

$10.00/MTok

Context Window400K

modelpicker.net

xai

Grok 4

Overall
4.08/5Strong

Benchmark Scores

Faithfulness
5/5
Long Context
5/5
Multilingual
5/5
Tool Calling
4/5
Classification
4/5
Agentic Planning
3/5
Structured Output
4/5
Safety Calibration
2/5
Strategic Analysis
5/5
Persona Consistency
5/5
Constrained Rewriting
4/5
Creative Problem Solving
3/5

External Benchmarks

SWE-bench Verified
N/A
MATH Level 5
N/A
AIME 2025
N/A

Pricing

Input

$3.00/MTok

Output

$15.00/MTok

Context Window256K

modelpicker.net

Benchmark Analysis

In our testing GPT-5 wins 4 benchmarks outright and ties on the rest. Side-by-side: - Tool calling: GPT-5 5 vs Grok 4 4 — GPT-5 tied for 1st (tied with 16 others out of 54), so it’s the safer pick when you need reliable function selection, argument accuracy, and sequencing. - Structured output: 5 vs 4 — GPT-5 tied for 1st of 54 (24 others share top score), meaning better JSON/schema compliance for integrations. - Creative problem solving: 4 vs 3 — GPT-5 ranks 9 of 54 (shared) versus Grok 4 at rank 30; expect more non-obvious, feasible ideas from GPT-5. - Agentic planning: 5 vs 3 — GPT-5 tied for 1st of 54 (14 others share top score); it decomposes goals and recovers from failures more consistently in our tests. Ties (both models match): strategic analysis (5/5 — both tied for 1st), constrained rewriting (4/4), faithfulness (5/5), classification (4/4 — both tied for 1st), long context (5/5 — both tied for 1st), safety calibration (2/2), persona consistency (5/5), multilingual (5/5). Practical meaning: both models handle long contexts (30K+ tokens) and preserve faithfulness and persona equally well in our tests, but GPT-5 gives measurable advantages for tool-driven workflows, strict schema outputs, and creative or multi-step planning. External benchmarks (independent) reinforce GPT-5’s strengths: it scores 73.6% on SWE-bench Verified (Epoch AI), 98.1% on MATH Level 5 (Epoch AI), and 91.4% on AIME 2025 (Epoch AI), highlighting its coding/math capabilities; Grok 4 has no external scores in the payload to compare.

BenchmarkGPT-5Grok 4
Faithfulness5/55/5
Long Context5/55/5
Multilingual5/55/5
Tool Calling5/54/5
Classification4/54/5
Agentic Planning5/53/5
Structured Output5/54/5
Safety Calibration2/52/5
Strategic Analysis5/55/5
Persona Consistency5/55/5
Constrained Rewriting4/54/5
Creative Problem Solving4/53/5
Summary4 wins0 wins

Pricing Analysis

Listed rates: GPT-5 charges $1.25 per input mTok and $10 per output mTok; Grok 4 charges $3 per input mTok and $15 per output mTok. The payload's priceRatio (0.6667) reflects output-rate parity ($10 vs $15). Using a simple 50/50 split of input/output tokens, per-month costs are: GPT-5 = $5,625 (1M tokens), $56,250 (10M), $562,500 (100M); Grok 4 = $9,000 (1M), $90,000 (10M), $900,000 (100M). High-volume customers (10M+ tokens/month) will see six-figure monthly differences: switching from Grok 4 to GPT-5 saves $33,750 at 10M and $337,500 at 100M under the 50/50 assumption. Teams building cost-sensitive services, high-throughput APIs, or large-agent fleets should care most about this gap; experimental or low-volume users may tolerate Grok 4’s higher rates for product-specific reasons.

Real-World Cost Comparison

TaskGPT-5Grok 4
iChat response$0.0053$0.0081
iBlog post$0.021$0.032
iDocument batch$0.525$0.810
iPipeline run$5.25$8.10

Bottom Line

Choose GPT-5 if you need top tool-calling reliability, strict structured outputs, stronger creative problem solving, or the best math/coding external scores — and you want lower listed token rates ($1.25/$10). Choose Grok 4 if you specifically prefer xai’s model behavior or product integrations and are willing to pay higher rates ($3/$15); Grok 4 ties GPT-5 on faithfulness, long-context retrieval, multilingual output, classification, and strategic analysis, so it’s viable where those properties matter and price is secondary.

How We Test

We test every model against our 12-benchmark suite covering tool calling, agentic planning, creative problem solving, safety calibration, and more. Each test is scored 1–5 by an LLM judge. Read our full methodology.

Frequently Asked Questions