models/inclusionai/ling-2-6-flash
I
inclusionai·active

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

inclusionai's efficiency model. Context window: 262K tokens.

Overall score
4.08
/5.00 · ranked #83
Input
$0.010
per 1M tokens
Output
$0.030
per 1M tokens
Context
262K
tokens
Blended
$0.025
3:1 out:in ratio

Price drops, new benchmarks, model updates. Stay current on inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash.

One email per change. Unsubscribe anytime.

modelpicker.aipowered by live benchmark data

Scores by test

Methodology →
Structured Output
5.0
Strategic Analysis
4.0
Constrained Rewriting
3.0
Creative Problem Solving
4.0
Tool Calling
4.0
Faithfulness
5.0
Classification
4.0
Long Context
4.0
Safety Calibration
2.0
Persona Consistency
5.0
Agentic Planning
5.0
Multilingual
5.0
Tabular Data
3.0

What you need to know

Ling-2.6-flash is primarily a high-reliability utility model, distinguished by perfect scores in structured output, faithfulness, and persona consistency. Its ability to adhere to strict formats and maintain factual accuracy makes it a strong candidate for data extraction and persona-driven automation. With a 262K context window, it handles large datasets effectively, scoring 4/5 in long context performance.

At a blended cost of $0.025 per million tokens, this model is exceptionally inexpensive. It provides high-tier performance in agentic planning and multilingual tasks at a price point that allows for massive scaling without significant cost overhead. It offers a high value-to-performance ratio for developers who prioritize execution over creative flexibility.

The model's primary technical liability is safety calibration, where it scores a 2/5. It also shows relative weakness in constrained rewriting. Developers should expect less rigor in content filtering and may need to implement external guardrails to manage output safety.

Use this model if you need a low-cost, high-fidelity engine for structured data generation, multilingual agents, or tasks requiring strict persona adherence. Skip this model if your application requires high native safety calibration or complex, constrained text rewriting.

Strengths — Top 3

Structured Output5.0/5.0
Faithfulness5.0/5.0
Persona Consistency5.0/5.0

Relative weaknesses — Bottom 3

Safety Calibration2.0/5.0
Constrained Rewriting3.0/5.0
Tabular Data3.0/5.0

Similar models

SStepFun: Step 3.5 Flash$0.2504.23GGemma 4 31B$0.4684.38AClaude Haiku 4.5$4.004.23NNVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra$2.854.46